Pricing analysis · Estimates only · No official price list released
Springleaf Central Residences price: estimated PSF, entry price and comparables
No official price list has been released by the developer as at 9 August 2026. Everything below is analyst projection anchored in the S$1,062 psf ppr land cost and named District 26 comparables — updated the moment official pricing lands.
How much will Springleaf Central Residences cost?
Analyst projections place Springleaf Central Residences at roughly S$2,300–2,400 per square foot (est.) at launch, with one-bedroom entry quantums from about S$1.01 million (est.) and three-bedroom units around S$2.05–2.50 million (est.). The reasoning starts with the land: S$613.9 million works out to about S$1,062 psf ppr, and layering estimated construction of roughly S$480 psf including the Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design requirements, plus financing and fees of roughly S$180 psf, implies a developer breakeven near S$1,720 psf (est.). ERA Research's own published read is that the site could launch at an average of at least S$2,300 psf. None of these figures is developer-confirmed and all are subject to change. The official price list is expected alongside the developer's preview package, estimated for late 2026 to the first half of 2027 — register to receive it the day it is published.
Is S$2,300–2,400 psf expensive for District 26?
Anchor the question in the land rather than the district's history. Springleaf Central Residences' S$1,062 psf ppr land cost is the highest of the trailing 24-month District 26 comparable set, roughly 15–17% above Lentor Gardens at S$920 and Springleaf Parcel B at S$905, per URA tender records. That thins both the developer's margin buffer and the buyer's entry cushion, and it is the main reason a launch materially below S$2,300 psf looks unlikely. The counterweight is that Springleaf Residence next door launched at about S$2,175 psf in August 2025 and its trailing twelve-month resale sits around S$2,178 psf, per EdgeProp Singapore — so the projected gap over a completed, proven neighbour is modest. What the premium buys is the integrated MRT entrance and a newer, later-cycle asset. The honest verdict: priced to land economics, not cheap. Past performance of comparable projects is not indicative of future results.
How do TDSR and ABSD affect affordability at Springleaf Central Residences?
Private condominium financing is capped by the Total Debt Servicing Ratio at 55% of gross monthly income, computed against a medium-term interest-rate floor rather than the promotional rate a bank quotes today — so stress-test at the floor. Loan-to-value is 75% on a first housing loan, falling to 55% where the tenure exceeds 30 years or runs past age 65, 45% on a second and 35% on a third. Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty then shapes the all-in cost by profile: as at August 2026, Singapore Citizens pay 0% on a first residential property and 20% on a second, PRs pay 5% on a first and 30% on a second, and foreigners pay 60%. Verify current rates at IRAS before committing. At an estimated S$2.28 million three-bedroom entry (est.), a first-property citizen buyer's exposure is dominated by the 25% downpayment plus buyer's stamp duty. Nothing here is financial advice.
Where Springleaf Central Residences sits on the comparables ladder
| Project | Land cost (psf ppr) | Launch PSF | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Springleaf Residence (Parcel B, D26) | S$905 | ~S$2,175 (Aug 2025) | Sister plot next door; 941 units, 92% sold in launch weekend; 12-month resale ~S$2,178 psf |
| Lentor Gardens Residences (D26) | S$920 | ~S$2,300–2,450 (est.) | 499 units, Lentor Hills; previewed July 2026; three primary schools reachable |
| Springleaf Central Residences (est.) | S$1,062 | ~S$2,300–2,400 (est.) | Highest land rate of the trailing 24-month District 26 set; integrated Springleaf MRT entrance |
Sources: URA GLS tender records, ERA Research (31 Oct 2025), EdgeProp Singapore 2026 transaction data. Springleaf Central Residences figures are analyst estimates and are not developer-confirmed. Past performance of comparable projects is not indicative of future results.